Efficacy of past, present, and future fluid strategies in an improved large animal model of non-compressible intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Noncompressible hemorrhage is a leading cause of potentially survivable combat death, with the vast majority of such deaths occurring in the out-of-hospital environment. While large animal models of this process are important for device and therapeutic development, clinical practice has changed over time and past models must follow suit. Developed in conjunction with regulatory feedback, this study presents a modernized, out-of-hospital, noncompressible hemorrhage model, in conjunction with a randomized study of past, present, and future fluid options following a hypotensive resuscitation protocol consistent with current clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled experiment comparing three fluid resuscitation options in Yorkshire swine. Baseline data from animals of same size from previous experiments were analyzed (n = 70), and mean systolic blood pressure was determined, with a permissive hypotension resuscitation target defined as a 25% decrease from normal (67 mm Hg). After animal preparation, a grade IV to V liver laceration was induced. Animals bled freely for a 10-minute "time-to-responder" period, after which resuscitation occurred with randomized fluid in boluses to the goal target: 6% hetastarch in lactated electrolyte injection (HEX), normal saline (NS), or fresh whole blood (FWB). Animals were monitored for a total simulated "delay to definitive care" period of 2 hours postinjury. RESULTS: At the end of the 2-hour study period, 8.3% (1 of 12 swine) of the HEX group, 50% (6 of 12 swine) of the NS group, and 75% (9 of 12 swine) of the FWB had survived (p = 0.006), with Holm-Sidak pairwise comparisons showing a significant difference between HEX and FWB and (p = 0.005). Fresh whole blood had significantly higher systemic vascular resistance and hemoglobin levels compared with other groups (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Survival data support the movement away from HEX toward NS and, preferably, FWB in clinical practice and translational animal modeling. The presented model allows for future research including basic science, as well as translational studies of novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and devices.

Blunt trauma to abdominal solid organs: an experience of non-operative management at a rural hospital in Zambia.

INTRODUCTION: although non-operative management of patients with blunt trauma to abdominal solid organs has become standard care, the role of peripheral hospitals remains poorly defined. This study reviews treatment and outcomes in patients with liver and spleen injuries at a regional hospital over a 10-year period. METHODS: a retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed and supplemented by case notes retrieval. All patients with solid visceral injuries managed between 2009 and 2019 at a rural surgical hospital in Zambia were included. On admission, the patients were offered either urgent laparotomy or non-operative management (NOM) depending on their haemodynamic status. Continuous variables were expressed as median and mean ± standard deviation; categorical data were expressed as percentages. Statistical evaluation of data was performed by two-sample t-test. Statistical significance was assigned at p<0.05. RESULTS: fourty-three patients were included. The majority of victims sustained isolated spleen or liver injury. Twenty-three patients were urgently operated due to haemodynamic instability. Splenectomy performed in 17 patients, liver laceration sutured in 5 patients. One patient underwent concomitant splenectomy and liver repair. Conservative management was attempted in 20 (47%) patients and was successful in 18 (42%). In two patients NOM failed and splenectomy was performed urgently. Two patients died postoperatively. There were no deaths in NOM group. CONCLUSION: NOM of patients with injury to solid abdominal organs could be safely initiated in rural hospitals provided there is uninterrupted monitoring of patients' condition, well-trained staff and unrestricted access to the operating theatre (OT).

Novel intraperitoneal hemostasis device prolongs survival in a swine model of noncompressible abdominal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) of the abdomen is a challenge to rapidly control and treat in the prehospital and emergency department settings. In this pilot study, we developed a novel intraperitoneal hemostasis device (IPHD) prototype and evaluated its ability for slowing NCTH and prolonging survival in a porcine model of lethal abdominal multiorgan hemorrhage. METHODS: Yorkshire male swine (N = 8) were instrumented under general anesthesia for monitoring of hemodynamics and blood sampling. Animals were subjected to a 30% controlled arterial hemorrhage followed by lacerating combinations of the liver, spleen, and kidney. The abdomen was closed and after 2 minutes of NCTH, and the IPHD was inserted into the peritoneal cavity via an introducer (n = 5). The balloon was inflated and maintained for 60 minutes. At 60 minutes postdeployment, the balloon was deflated and removed, and blood resuscitation was initiated followed by gauze packing for hemostasis. The remaining animals (n = 3) were used as controls and subjected to the same injury without intervention. RESULTS: All animals managed with IPHD intervention (5 of 5 swine) survived the duration of the intervention period (60 minutes), while all control animals (3 of 3 swine) died at a time range of 15 to 43 minutes following organ injury (p = 0.0042). Animals receiving IPHD remained hemodynamically stable with a mean arterial pressure range of 44.86 to 55.10 mm Hg and experienced increased cardiac output and decreased shock index after treatment. Controls experienced hemodynamic decline in all parameters until endpoints were met. Upon IPHD deflation and removal, all treated animals began to hemorrhage again and expired within 2 to 132 minutes despite packing. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the IPHD concept is capable of prolonging survival by temporarily stanching lethal NCTH of the abdomen. This device may be an effective temporary countermeasure to NCTH of the abdomen that could be deployed in the prehospital environment or as a bridge to more advanced therapy.

Combined head and abdominal blunt trauma in the hemodynamically unstable patient: What takes priority?

BACKGROUND: The management of hypotensive patients with severe combined head and abdominal trauma is challenging, regarding the need, timing, and sequence of craniotomy or laparotomy. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether rare situations requiring craniotomy prior to laparotomy can be identified on admission with simple clinical parameters. We hypothesized that hypotension is rarely associated with the need of a combined procedure, especially in patients with mildly depressed consciousness. METHODS: National Trauma Data Bank study, including adult blunt trauma patients with combined severe head (Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥ 3) and abdominal injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥ 3). Data collection included demographic and clinical characteristics, laparotomy, and craniotomy within 24 hours of admission, types of intracranial pathologies, survival, and hospital stay. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine factors predictive for the need of both operative procedures. RESULTS: Of 25,585 patients with severe combined head and abdominal trauma, 8,744 (34.2%) needed only laparotomy, 534 (2.1%) only craniotomy, and 394 (1.5%) required both procedures within 24 hours of admission. In the subgroup of 4,667 hypotensive patients, 2,421 (51.9%) underwent only laparotomy, 54 (1.2%) only craniotomy, and 79 (1.7%) both procedures within 24 hours of admission. Only 5 (0.7%) of 711 hypotensive patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score above 8 who required a laparotomy also needed a craniotomy. Among clinical parameters available on patient's arrival, GCS score of 7 to 8 was independently associated with the highest need for craniotomy in hypotensive patients requiring laparotomy (odds ratio, 7.94; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The need for craniotomy in patients with severe combined head and abdominal injury requiring exploratory laparotomy is very low. In hypotensive patients requiring laparotomy, GCS score of 7 to 8 was an independent predictor of the need for craniotomy. In hemodynamically unstable patients with a GCS score greater than 8, it may be safer to proceed with a laparotomy first and address the head with a computed tomography scan at a later stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.

Laparoscopic surgery for splenic injuries in the era of non-operative management: current status and future perspectives.

The spleen is one of the organs most commonly injured by blunt abdominal trauma. It plays an important role in immune response to infections, especially those sustained by encapsulated bacteria. Nonoperative management (NOM), comprising clinical and radiological observation with or without angioembolization, is the treatment of choice for traumatic splenic injury in patients who are hemodynamically stable. However, this strategy carries a risk of failure, especially for high-grade injuries. No clear predictors of failure have been identified, but minimally invasive surgery for splenic injury is gaining popularity. Laparoscopic surgery has been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for hemodynamically stable patients who require surgery, such as after failed NOM. We reviewed research articles on laparoscopic surgery for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma to explore the current knowledge about this topic. After presenting an overview of the treatments for splenic trauma and the immunological function of the spleen, we try to identify the future indications for laparoscopic surgery in the era of NOM.

Concurrent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Liver Transplant: Multidisciplinary Management of Multiple Posttraumatic Lesions.

Association of thoracic and abdominal injuries in patients with major trauma is common. Under emergency conditions, it is often difficult to promptly perform a certain diagnosis and identify treatment priorities of life-threatening lesions. We present the case of a young man with combined thoracic and abdominal injuries after a motorcycle accident. Primary evaluation through echography and X-ray showed fluid within the hepatorenal recess and an enlarged mediastinum. Volume load, blood transfusions, and vasoactive agents were initiated to sustain circulation. Despite hemodynamic instability, we decided to perform computed tomographic angiography (CTA) scan that revealed a high-grade traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm, multiple and severe areas of liver contusion, and a small amount of hemoperitoneum, without active bleeding spots. The patient was successfully submitted to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Immediately after the end of the successful TEVAR, signs of massive abdominal bleeding revealed. Immediate explorative laparotomy was performed showing massive hepatic hemorrhage. After liver packing and Pringle's maneuver, control of bleeding was lastly obtained with hemostatic devices and selective cross-clamping of the right hepatic artery. The patient was then transferred to intensive care unit where, despite absence of further hemorrhage, hemodynamic instability, anuria, severe lactic acidosis together with liver necrosis indices appeared. A new CTA demonstrated massive parenchymal disruption within the right lobe of the liver and multiple hematomas in the left lobe. Considering the high-grade lesions of the hepatic vascular tree and liver failure, patient was listed for emergency liver transplantation (LT). LT occurred few hours later, and patient's clinical conditions rapidly improved even if the subsequent clinical course was characterized by a severe fungal infection because of immunosuppression. Evaluation of life-threatening lesions and treatment priorities, availability of different excellence skills, and multidisciplinary collaboration have a key role to achieve clinical success in such severe cases.

Delta neutrophil index for predicting mortality in trauma patients who underwent emergent abdominal surgery: A case controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Delta neutrophil index (DNI) can be used as a biomarker for infection to predict patient outcomes. We aimed to investigate the relationship between DNI and clinical outcomes in trauma patients who underwent abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed injured patients who underwent emergent abdominal surgery in the regional trauma center of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital between March 2016 and May 2018. Patient characteristics, operation type, preoperative and postoperative laboratory findings, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed for risk factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients (mean age, 53.8 years; 66.3% male) were enrolled in this study, of which 19 (11.2%) died. The median injury severity score (ISS) was 12. The non-survivors had a significantly higher ISS [25(9-50) vs. 10(1-50), p<0.001] and serum lactate level (9.00±4.10 vs. 3.04±2.23, p<0.001) and more frequent shock (63.2% vs 23.3%, p<0.001) and solid organ injury (52.6% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.013) than the survivors. There were significant differences in postoperative DNI between the two groups (p<0.009 immediate post-operation, p = 0.001 on postoperative day 1 [POD1], and p = 0.013 on POD2). Logistic regression analysis showed that the independent factors associated with mortality were postoperative lactate level (odds ratio [OR] 1.926, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.101-3.089, p = 0.007), postoperative sequential organ failure assessment score (OR 1.593, 95% CI 1.160-2.187, p = 0.004), and DNI on POD1 (OR 1.118, 95% CI 1.028-1.215, p = 0.009). The receiver operating characteristics curve demonstrated that the area under the curve of DNI on POD1 was 0.887 (cut-off level: 7.1%, sensitivity 85.7%, and specificity 84.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative DNI may be a useful biomarker to predict mortality in trauma patients who underwent emergent abdominal surgery.

Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions - a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023).

OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design comparing epidural analgesia (EDA) with continuous wound infiltration (CWI) in respect to postoperative complications and mobility to design a future multicentre randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: CWI has been developed to address drawbacks of EDA. Previous studies have established the equivalent analgesic potential of CWI compared to EDA. This is a single centre, non-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial at a tertiary surgical centre. Patients undergoing elective non-colorectal surgery via a midline laparotomy were randomized to EDA or CWI. Endpoints included recruitment, feasibility of assessing postoperative mobility with a pedometer and morbidity. No primary endpoint was defined and all analyses were explorative. INTERVENTIONS: CWI with local anaesthetics (experimental group) vs. thoracic EDA (control). RESULTS: Of 846 patients screened within 14 months, 71 were randomized and 62 (31 per group) included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mobility was assessed in 44 of 62 patients and revealed no differences within the first 3 postoperative days. Overall morbidity did not differ between the two groups (measured via the comprehensive complication index). Median pain scores at rest were comparable between the two groups, while EDA was superior in pain treatment during movement on the first, but not on the second and third postoperative day. Duration of preoperative induction of anaesthesia was shorter with CWI than with EDA. Of 17 serious adverse events, 3 were potentially related to EDA, while none was related to CWI. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed the feasibility of a randomized trial design to compare CWI and EDA regarding morbidity. Improvements in the education and training of team members are necessary to improve recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00008023.

Outcomes following resuscitative thoracotomy for abdominal exsanguination, a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative thoracotomy is a damage control procedure with an established role in the immediate treatment of patients in extremis or cardiac arrest secondary to cardiac tamponade however Its role in resuscitation of patients with abdominal exsanguination is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review was to estimate mortality based on survival to discharge in patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage from abdominal trauma in cardiac arrest or a peri arrest clinical condition following a resuscitative thoracotomy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify original research that reported outcomes in resuscitative thoracotomy either in the emergency department or pre-hospital environment in patients suffering or suspected of suffering from intra-abdominal injuries. The primary outcome was to assess survival to discharge. The secondary outcomes assessed were neurological function post procedure and the role of timing of intervention on survival. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective case series were reviewed by a single author which described 584 patients with isolated abdominal trauma and an additional 1745 suffering from polytrauma including abdominal injuries. Isolated abdominal trauma survival to discharge ranged from 0 to 18% with polytrauma survival of 0-9.7% with the majority below 1%. Survival following a thoracotomy for abdominal trauma varied between studies and with no comparison non-intervention group no definitive conclusions could be drawn. Timing of thoracotomy was important with improved mortality in patients not in cardiac arrest or having the procedure performed just after a loss of signs of life. Normal neurological function at discharge ranged from 100 to 28.5% with the presence of a head injury having a negative impact on both survival and long-term morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-theatre thoracotomy may have a role in peri-arrest or arrested patient with abdominal trauma. The best outcomes are achieved with patients not in cardiac arrest or who have recently arrested and with no head injury present. The earlier the intervention can be performed, the better the outcome for patients, with survival figures of up to 18% following a resuscitative thoracotomy. More high-quality evidence is required to demonstrate a definitive mortality benefit for patients.

Intra-abdominal pressure may be elevated in patients with open abdomen after emergent laparotomy.

PURPOSE: To estimate the change in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) among critically ill patient who were left with open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure after laparotomy, during the first 48 h after admission. METHODS: A cohort study in a single ICU in a tertiary care hospital. All adult patients admitted to the ICU after emergent laparotomy for acute abdomen or trauma, who were left with temporary abdominal closure (TAC), were included. Patients were followed up to 48 h. IAP was routinely measured at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after admission to ICU. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included, 34 were operated due to acute abdomen and 5 due to abdominal trauma. Seventeen patients were treated with skin closure, 13 with Bogota bag, and 9 with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Eleven patients (28.2%) had IAP of 15 mmHg or above at time 0, (mean pressure 19.0 ± 3.0 mmHg), and it dropped to 12 ± 4 mmHg within 48 h (p < 0.01). Reduction in lactate level (2.4 ± 1.0 to 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L, p < 0.01) and increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (163 ± 34 to 231 ± 83, p = 0.03) were observed as well after 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large report of IAP in open abdomen. Elevated IAP may be measured in open abdomen and may subsequently relieve after 48 h.

An evidence-based algorithm decreases computed tomography use in hemodynamically stable pediatric blunt abdominal trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns about overuse of abdominopelvic-computed tomography (CTAP) in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) given malignancy risks. This study evaluates how an evidence-based algorithm affected CTAP and hospital resource use for hemodynamically stable children with BAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of hemodynamically stable pediatric BAT patients one year before and after algorithm implementation. We included children less than or equal to 14 years of age treated in a Level I pediatric trauma center. We compared CTAP rates before and after algorithm implementation. RESULTS: There were 65 in the pre- and 50 in the post-algorithm implementation group, and CTAPs decreased by 27% (p = 0.02). The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio of receiving a CTAP after algorithm implementation were 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-0.6) and 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.7), respectively. There were no significant missed injuries in the post cohort. ED length of stay (LOS) decreased by 53 min (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based algorithm safely decreased CTAPs for pediatric BAT with no increase in hospital resource utilization.

Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.

BACKGROUND: In mass casualty incidents (MCI), death usually occurs within the first few hours and thus early transfer to a trauma centre can be crucial in selected cases. However, most triage systems designed to prioritize the transfer to hospital of these patients do not assess the need for surgery, in part due to inconclusive evidence regarding the value of such an assessment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of a new triage system-the Prehospital Advanced Triage Method (META)-to identify victims who could benefit from urgent surgical assessment in case of MCI. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, observational study of a multipurpose cohort of patients included in the severe trauma registry of the Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital (Spain) between June 1993 and December 2011. All data were prospectively evaluated. All patients were evaluated with the META system to determine whether they met the criteria for urgent transfer. The META defines patients in need of urgent surgical assessment: (a) All penetrating injuries to head, neck, torso and extremities proximal to elbow or knee, (b) Open pelvic fracture, (c) Closed pelvic fracture with mechanical or haemodynamic instability and (d) Blunt torso trauma with haemodynamic instability. Patients who fulfilled these criteria were designated as "Urgent Evacuation for Surgical Assessment" (UESA) cases; all other cases were designated as non-UESA. The following variables were assessed: patient status at the scene; severity scales [RTS, Shock index, MGAP (Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, pressure), GCS]; need for surgery and/or interventional procedure to control bleeding (UESA); and mortality. The two groups (UESA vs. non-UESA) were then compared. RESULTS: A total of 1882 cases from the database were included in the study. Mean age was 39.2 years and most (77%) patients were male. UESA patients presented significantly worse on-scene hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure and heart rate) and greater injury severity (RTS, shock index, and MGAP scales). No differences were observed for respiratory rate, need for orotracheal intubation, or GCS scores. The anatomical injuries of patients in the UESA group were less severe but these patients had a greater need for urgent surgery and higher mortality rates. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the META triage classification system could be beneficial to help identify patients with severe trauma and/or in need of urgent surgical assessment at the scene of injury in case of MCI. These findings demonstrate that, in this cohort, the META fulfils the purpose for which it was designed.

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve improves intestinal blood flow after trauma and hemorrhagic shock.

BACKGROUND: Gut damage after trauma/hemorrhagic shock contributes to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Electrical vagal nerve stimulation is known to prevent gut damage in animal models of trauma/hemorrhagic shock by altering the gut inflammatory response; however, the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on intestinal blood flow, which is an essential function of the vagus nerve, is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether vagal nerve stimulation influences the abdominal vagus nerve activity, intestinal blood flow, gut injury, and the levels of autonomic neuropeptides. METHODS: Male Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized, and the cervical and abdominal vagus nerves were exposed. One pair of bipolar electrodes was attached to the cervical vagus nerve to stimulate it; another pair of bipolar electrodes were attached to the abdominal vagus nerve to measure action potentials. The rats underwent trauma/hemorrhagic shock (with maintenance of mean arterial pressure of 25 mmHg for 30 min) without fluid resuscitation and received cervical vagal nerve stimulation post-injury. A separate cohort of animals were subjected to transection of the abdominal vagus nerve (vagotomy) just before the start of cervical vagal nerve stimulation. Intestinal blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. Gut injury and noradrenaline level in the portal venous plasma were also assessed. RESULTS: Vagal nerve stimulation evoked action potentials in the abdominal vagus nerve and caused a 2-fold increase in intestinal blood flow compared to the shock phase (P < .05). Abdominal vagotomy eliminated the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on intestinal blood flow (P < .05). Vagal nerve stimulation protected against trauma/hemorrhagic shock -induced gut injury (P < .05), and circulating noradrenaline levels were decreased after vagal nerve stimulation (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Cervical vagal nerve stimulation evoked abdominal vagal nerve activity and relieved the trauma/hemorrhagic shock-induced impairment in intestinal blood flow by modulating the vasoconstriction effect of noradrenaline, which provides new insight into the protective effect of vagal nerve stimulation.

Is I-FABP not only a marker for the detection abdominal injury but also of hemorrhagic shock in severely injured trauma patients?

Background: Hemorrhagic shock can lead to intestinal damage with subsequent hyperinflammation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) is solely expressed in the intestine and is released extracellulary after tissue damage. This study evaluates the validity of I-FABP as an early biomarker to detect hemorrhagic shock and abdominal injury. Patients and methods: Severely injured patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 points and an age ≥ 18 years, admitted from January 2010 to December 2016, were included. Overall, 26 patients retrospectively presented with hemorrhagic shock to the emergency room (ER): 8 patients without abdominal injury ("HS noAbd") and 18 patients with abdominal injury ("HS Abd"). Furthermore, 16 severely injured patients without hemorrhagic shock and without abdominal injury ("noHS noAbd") were retrospectively selected as controls. Plasma I-FABP levels were measured at admission to the ER and up to 3 days posttraumatic (d1-d3). Results: Median I-FABP levels were significantly higher in the "HS Abd" group compared with the "HS noAbd" group (28,637.0 pg/ml [IQR = 6372.4-55,550.0] vs. 7292.3 pg/ml [IQR = 1282.5-11,159.5], p < 0.05). Furthermore, I-FABP levels of both hemorrhagic shock groups were significantly higher compared with the "noHS noAbd" group (844.4 pg/ml [IQR = 530.0-1432.9], p < 0.05). The time course of I-FABP levels showed a peak on the day of admission with a subsequent decline in the post-traumatic course. Furthermore, significant correlations between I-FABP levels and clinical parameters of hemorrhagic shock, such as hemoglobin, lactate value, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and shock index, were found.The optimal cut-off level of I-FABP for detection of hemorrhagic shock was 1761.9 pg/ml with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 81%. Conclusion: This study confirmed our previous observation that I-FABP might be used as a suitable early biomarker for the detection of abdominal injuries in general. In addition, I-FABP may also be a useful and a promising parameter in the diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, because of reflecting low intestinal perfusion.

Point-of Care Ultrasonographically Guided Proximal External Aortic Compression in the Emergency Department.

In cases of severe subdiaphragmatic vascular trauma, only in extremis interventions such as emergency thoracotomy with aortic cross clamping or resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta are available for temporization until definitive care. This case report proposes a noninvasive approach consisting of localizing the proximal aorta with ultrasonographic guidance and applying a compressive force to occlude the aorta and limit distal flow. Using point-of-care ultrasonography allows precise compression, continuous monitoring of its efficacy, and early detection of return of spontaneous circulation in arrest patients. We present the case of a patient who sustained a gunshot wound causing a left iliac artery injury and subsequent cardiac arrest while he was on route to the hospital. Point-of-care ultrasonographically guided proximal external aortic compression was attempted and return of spontaneous circulation was achieved and maintained, allowing transfer of the patient to the operating room. This single-case report suggests that point-of-care ultrasonographically guided proximal external aortic compression could be used as a bridge to definitive care or to more advanced techniques such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and emergency department thoracotomy with aortic cross clamping.

Management strategies and outcome of blunt traumatic abdominal wall defects: a single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic abdominal wall defects (TAWDs) following blunt trauma are uncommon injuries with an incidence reported less than 1%. Improved diagnostics and subsequent early detection of otherwise rare injuries raise more questions concerning their treatment. There is lack of consensus on treatment and timing of TAWD. The aim of this study was to analyse the management strategy and outcomes of these injuries in our level I trauma centre. METHODS: All trauma patients who presented with a TAWD at our trauma centre between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Blunt abdominal wall injuries were classified, patient characteristics, concomitant injuries and treatment characteristics were recorded. In addition, telephone surveys were conducted to assess patient reported quality of life. RESULTS: In a period of nearly ten years 21 patients with a TAWD were treated in our hospital, approximately 0.17% of all admitted trauma patients. Seventeen patients were classified as polytrauma patient. Seventeen patients underwent surgical repair in whom 5 recurrences occurred. All of the recurrences were in patients treated without mesh repair (p = 0.03). The quality of life in terms of EQ-VAS was similar for patients treated with and without mesh repair and reasonable when compared to the reference population. Overall quality of life was lower compared to the reference population, mainly due to limitations in daily activities, mobility and pain. CONCLUSION: Using mesh in the treatment of TAWD, in our hands, showed significantly less recurrences compared to primary closure. We therefore recommend the use of mesh in the repair of TAWDs, both in the acute as well as in the delayed setting when feasible.

Diagnostic accuracy of eFAST in the trauma patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Performing an extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) exam is common practice in the initial assessment of trauma patients. The objective of this study was to systematically review the published literature on diagnostic accuracy of all components of the eFAST exam. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase from inception through October 2018, for diagnostic studies examining the sensitivity and specificity of the eFAST exam. After removal of duplicates, 767 records remained for screening, of which 119 underwent full text review. Meta-DiSc™ software was used to create pooled sensitivities and specificities for included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: Seventy-five studies representing 24,350 patients satisfied our selection criteria. Studies were published between 1989 and 2017. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated for the detection of pneumothorax (69% and 99% respectively), pericardial effusion (91% and 94% respectively), and intra-abdominal free fluid (74% and 98% respectively). Sub-group analysis was completed for detection of intra-abdominal free fluid in hypotensive (sensitivity 74% and specificity 95%), adult normotensive (sensitivity 76% and specificity 98%) and pediatric patients (sensitivity 71% and specificity 95%). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that e-FAST is a useful bedside tool for ruling in pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, and intra-abdominal free fluid in the trauma setting. Its usefulness as a rule-out tool is not supported by these results.

OBJECTIF: Le recours à l'évaluation ciblée par échographie étendue en traumatologie (eFAST : sigle anglais) est pratique courante dans l'évaluation initiale des patients ayant subi un trauma. L'étude avait donc pour but une revue systématique de la documentation publiée sur l'exactitude du diagnostic reposant sur tous les éléments constitutifs de l'eFAST. MÉTHODE: Les chercheurs ont effectué une recherche d'études sur les examens de diagnostic ayant pour objets la sensibilité et la spécificité de l'eFAST, dans les bases de données Medline et Embase, depuis leur début respectif jusqu'à octobre 2018. Après le retrait des doubles, il restait 767 documents aux fins de sélection, dont 119 ont été soumis à un examen en texte intégral. Le logiciel Meta-DiScMC a servi à établir la sensibilité et la spécificité globales des études retenues. Quant à la qualité des études, elle a été évaluée à l'aide de l'instrument Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUADAS-2). RÉSULTATS: Au total, 75 études totalisant 24 350 patients et publiées entre 1989 et 2017 répondaient aux critères de sélection. La sensibilité et la spécificité globales ont été calculées pour la détection des pneumothorax (69% et 99% respectivement), des épanchements péricardiques (91% et 94% respectivement) et de liquide libre intra-abdominal (74% et 98% respectivement). Il y a eu également analyse de sous-groupes en vue de la détection de liquide libre intra-abdominal chez les patients hypotendus (sensibilité : 74%; spécificité : 95%), les adultes normotendus (sensibilité : 76%; spécificité : 98%) et les enfants (sensibilité : 71%; spécificité : 95%). CONCLUSION: D'après les résultats de la revue systématique et de la méta-analyse, l'eFAST au chevet se montre utile pour confirmer la présence de pneumothorax, d'épanchement péricardique ou de liquide libre intra-abdominal en traumatologie, mais pas pour en écarter la présence.